<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Markets and Election Outcomes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2004/09/26/markets-and-election-outcomes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2004/09/26/markets-and-election-outcomes/</link>
	<description>My opinions only. I do not represent any organization in this publication.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 02:36:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Linksvayer &#187; Experts agree to bark like dogs</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2004/09/26/markets-and-election-outcomes/#comment-23945</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer &#187; Experts agree to bark like dogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2006 05:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2004/09/26/markets-and-election-outcomes/#comment-23945</guid>
		<description>[...] Fortunately there are again (see Historical Presidential Betting Markets) markets to give anyone who wants one a reality check. However, it is rare (in the U.S.) for a &#8220;third party&#8221; candidate to be significant enough for an election market to cast any light on their chances. Often &#8220;field&#8221; will be available (for example, Intrade currently lists the following spreads for 2008 Presidential Election Winner (Political Party): Democrat 49.1/49.2, Republican 47.6/48.4, Field 2.9/3.2) but chance accorded by traders to &#8220;the field&#8221; has to be based on the expectation that a viable independent will come out of the woodwork (e.g., Ross Perot in 1988) rather than the expectation that a Green, Libertarian, or other minor party candidate has a non-negligible chance of victory. This is too bad in a way, as my casual observation says that minor party backers are more delusional than most when it comes to their candidate&#8217;s chances. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fortunately there are again (see Historical Presidential Betting Markets) markets to give anyone who wants one a reality check. However, it is rare (in the U.S.) for a &#8220;third party&#8221; candidate to be significant enough for an election market to cast any light on their chances. Often &#8220;field&#8221; will be available (for example, Intrade currently lists the following spreads for 2008 Presidential Election Winner (Political Party): Democrat 49.1/49.2, Republican 47.6/48.4, Field 2.9/3.2) but chance accorded by traders to &#8220;the field&#8221; has to be based on the expectation that a viable independent will come out of the woodwork (e.g., Ross Perot in 1988) rather than the expectation that a Green, Libertarian, or other minor party candidate has a non-negligible chance of victory. This is too bad in a way, as my casual observation says that minor party backers are more delusional than most when it comes to their candidate&#8217;s chances. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Linksvayer &#187; Becker-Posner for Perpetual War</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2004/09/26/markets-and-election-outcomes/#comment-3779</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer &#187; Becker-Posner for Perpetual War</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2006 06:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2004/09/26/markets-and-election-outcomes/#comment-3779</guid>
		<description>[...] Hindsight is wonderful, eh? Unfortunately there&#8217;s no reason to expect it to be 20-20 unless we hold nearly everything constant. Foresight is even harder. We desperately need tools that provide better estimates of the impact of policy than bogus intellectual handwaving and self-serving bureaucratic guesstimation. Conditional futures, which I&#8217;ve mentioned here and here may be one such tool. I don&#8217;t think conditional futures is quite the term of art, but see Robin Hanson&#8217;s page on policy markets for a good explanation and his pages on the Policy Analysis Market and idea futures for far more in depth treatment. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hindsight is wonderful, eh? Unfortunately there&#8217;s no reason to expect it to be 20-20 unless we hold nearly everything constant. Foresight is even harder. We desperately need tools that provide better estimates of the impact of policy than bogus intellectual handwaving and self-serving bureaucratic guesstimation. Conditional futures, which I&#8217;ve mentioned here and here may be one such tool. I don&#8217;t think conditional futures is quite the term of art, but see Robin Hanson&#8217;s page on policy markets for a good explanation and his pages on the Policy Analysis Market and idea futures for far more in depth treatment. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Linksvayer</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2004/09/26/markets-and-election-outcomes/#comment-3536</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 08:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2004/09/26/markets-and-election-outcomes/#comment-3536</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Prediction Markets Summit extract of an extract&lt;/strong&gt;

	I sadly could not attend last Friday&#8217;s mini-conference in San Francisco on prediction markets, but Peter McCluskey has an informative write up.
	Apparently Tradesports explained why it makes it a pain to link to its contracts. They want to sell ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Prediction Markets Summit extract of an extract</strong></p>
<p>	I sadly could not attend last Friday&#8217;s mini-conference in San Francisco on prediction markets, but Peter McCluskey has an informative write up.<br />
	Apparently Tradesports explained why it makes it a pain to link to its contracts. They want to sell &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Linksvayer</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2004/09/26/markets-and-election-outcomes/#comment-3320</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2005 05:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2004/09/26/markets-and-election-outcomes/#comment-3320</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Three open source prediction market software options&lt;/strong&gt;

	In May there were none.
	The software that has run Foresight Exchange for many years was open sourced today (under an odd license).
	Zocalo had a new release last week.
	FreeMarket seems to have been available  for a little over a month.
	For the heck...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Three open source prediction market software options</strong></p>
<p>	In May there were none.<br />
	The software that has run Foresight Exchange for many years was open sourced today (under an odd license).<br />
	Zocalo had a new release last week.<br />
	FreeMarket seems to have been available  for a little over a month.<br />
	For the heck&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Linksvayer  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Aubrey de Grey at Stanford</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2004/09/26/markets-and-election-outcomes/#comment-3043</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Aubrey de Grey at Stanford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2005 06:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2004/09/26/markets-and-election-outcomes/#comment-3043</guid>
		<description>[...]  could meet this claim.) 	It would be very interesting to see versions of the above claims conditioned on the M Prize reaching some fundraising goal.  	
 					
 				 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  could meet this claim.) 	It would be very interesting to see versions of the above claims conditioned on the M Prize reaching some fundraising goal.  	</p>
<p> 				 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
