<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bush good for terrorist stocks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2004/11/02/bush-good-for-terrorist-stocks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2004/11/02/bush-good-for-terrorist-stocks/</link>
	<description>My opinions only. I do not represent any organization in this publication.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 02:54:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Futarchy Lite 2008 &#124; Midas Oracle .ORG</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2004/11/02/bush-good-for-terrorist-stocks/#comment-99968</link>
		<dc:creator>Futarchy Lite 2008 &#124; Midas Oracle .ORG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 17:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2004/11/02/bush-good-for-terrorist-stocks/#comment-99968</guid>
		<description>[...] Four years ago I used play money contracts traded at the Foresight Exchange to provide a Futarchist Voter Guide (though I didn&#8217;t call it that). This U.S. election cycle relevant real money contracts are traded on Intrade. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Four years ago I used play money contracts traded at the Foresight Exchange to provide a Futarchist Voter Guide (though I didn&#8217;t call it that). This U.S. election cycle relevant real money contracts are traded on Intrade. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Linksvayer &#187; Futarchist Voter Guide</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2004/11/02/bush-good-for-terrorist-stocks/#comment-99956</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer &#187; Futarchist Voter Guide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 19:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2004/11/02/bush-good-for-terrorist-stocks/#comment-99956</guid>
		<description>[...] Four years ago I used play money contracts traded at the Foresight Exchange to provide a Futarchist Voter Guide (though I didn&#8217;t call it that). This U.S. election cycle relevant real money contracts are traded on Intrade. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Four years ago I used play money contracts traded at the Foresight Exchange to provide a Futarchist Voter Guide (though I didn&#8217;t call it that). This U.S. election cycle relevant real money contracts are traded on Intrade. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Linksvayer &#187; Most important political news of the day</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2004/11/02/bush-good-for-terrorist-stocks/#comment-97287</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer &#187; Most important political news of the day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 19:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2004/11/02/bush-good-for-terrorist-stocks/#comment-97287</guid>
		<description>[...] There were play money presidential decision markets in 2004. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There were play money presidential decision markets in 2004. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Linksvayer &#187; I support advertising on Wikipedia</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2004/11/02/bush-good-for-terrorist-stocks/#comment-70207</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer &#187; I support advertising on Wikipedia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 05:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2004/11/02/bush-good-for-terrorist-stocks/#comment-70207</guid>
		<description>[...] I strongly agree and will repeat exactly what I said during last year&#8217;s Wikimedia fund drive: Wikipedia chief considers taking ads (via Boing Boing) says that at current traffic levels, Wikipedia could generate hundreds of millions of dollars a year by running ads. There are strong objections to running ads from the community, but that is a staggering number for a tiny nonprofit, an annual amount that would be surpassed only by the wealthiest foundations. It could fund a staggering Wikimedia Foundation bureaucracy, or it could fund additional free knowledge projects. Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales has asked what will be free. Would an annual hundred million dollar budget increase the odds of those predictions? One way to find out before actually trying. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I strongly agree and will repeat exactly what I said during last year&#8217;s Wikimedia fund drive: Wikipedia chief considers taking ads (via Boing Boing) says that at current traffic levels, Wikipedia could generate hundreds of millions of dollars a year by running ads. There are strong objections to running ads from the community, but that is a staggering number for a tiny nonprofit, an annual amount that would be surpassed only by the wealthiest foundations. It could fund a staggering Wikimedia Foundation bureaucracy, or it could fund additional free knowledge projects. Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales has asked what will be free. Would an annual hundred million dollar budget increase the odds of those predictions? One way to find out before actually trying. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Linksvayer &#187; Defeatist dreaming</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2004/11/02/bush-good-for-terrorist-stocks/#comment-42515</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer &#187; Defeatist dreaming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 01:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2004/11/02/bush-good-for-terrorist-stocks/#comment-42515</guid>
		<description>[...] But if I were a donor with $100 million to give I&#8217;d try really hard to quantify my goals and predict the most impactful spending toward those goals. I&#8217;ll just repeat a paragraph from last December 30, Outsourcing charity &#8230; to Wikipedia: Wikipedia chief considers taking ads (via Boing Boing) says that at current traffic levels, Wikipedia could generate hundreds of millions of dollars a year by running ads. There are strong objections to running ads from the community, but that is a staggering number for a tiny nonprofit, an annual amount that would be surpassed only by the wealthiest foundations. It could fund a staggering Wikimedia Foundation bureaucracy, or it could fund additional free knowledge projects. Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales has asked what will be free. Would an annual hundred million dollar budget increase the odds of those predictions? One way to find out before actually trying. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But if I were a donor with $100 million to give I&#8217;d try really hard to quantify my goals and predict the most impactful spending toward those goals. I&#8217;ll just repeat a paragraph from last December 30, Outsourcing charity &#8230; to Wikipedia: Wikipedia chief considers taking ads (via Boing Boing) says that at current traffic levels, Wikipedia could generate hundreds of millions of dollars a year by running ads. There are strong objections to running ads from the community, but that is a staggering number for a tiny nonprofit, an annual amount that would be surpassed only by the wealthiest foundations. It could fund a staggering Wikimedia Foundation bureaucracy, or it could fund additional free knowledge projects. Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales has asked what will be free. Would an annual hundred million dollar budget increase the odds of those predictions? One way to find out before actually trying. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Linksvayer &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Outsourcing charity &#8230; to Wikipedia</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2004/11/02/bush-good-for-terrorist-stocks/#comment-3665</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Outsourcing charity &#8230; to Wikipedia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 21:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2004/11/02/bush-good-for-terrorist-stocks/#comment-3665</guid>
		<description>[...] Wikipedia chief considers taking ads (via Boing Boing) says that at current traffic levels, Wikipedia could generate hundreds of millions of dollars a year by running ads. There are strong objections to running ads from the community, but that is a staggering number for a tiny nonprofit, an annual amount that would be surpassed only by the wealthiest foundations. It could fund a staggering Wikimedia Foundation bureaucracy, or it could fund additional free knowledge projects. Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales has asked what will be free. Would an annual hundred million dollar budget increase the odds of those predictions? One way to find out before actually trying. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Wikipedia chief considers taking ads (via Boing Boing) says that at current traffic levels, Wikipedia could generate hundreds of millions of dollars a year by running ads. There are strong objections to running ads from the community, but that is a staggering number for a tiny nonprofit, an annual amount that would be surpassed only by the wealthiest foundations. It could fund a staggering Wikimedia Foundation bureaucracy, or it could fund additional free knowledge projects. Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales has asked what will be free. Would an annual hundred million dollar budget increase the odds of those predictions? One way to find out before actually trying. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
