<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Infoanarchy, DRM and Celestial Jukebox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2005/01/10/infoanarchy-drm-celestial-jukebox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2005/01/10/infoanarchy-drm-celestial-jukebox/</link>
	<description>My opinions only. I do not represent any organization in this publication.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 09:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Linksvayer &#187; Digital Rent-a-Center Management</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2005/01/10/infoanarchy-drm-celestial-jukebox/#comment-12868</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer &#187; Digital Rent-a-Center Management</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 02:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2005/01/10/infoanarchy-drm-and-celestia-jukebox/#comment-12868</guid>
		<description>[...] Yes, plenty of room to talk with recent posts entitled &#8216;Google bachelor watch: Larry and Lucy &#8220;kissy-faced&#8221; in Maui&#8217; and &#8216;Girl sues MySpace because boys are too hot&#8217; &#8230; regardless, Valleywag critically misses the point that DRM and more generally copyright are free speech issues. I find the U.S. policy of encouraging intellectual protectionism abroad appalling. If you don&#8217;t think such will be used to further censorship in oppressive states (and supposedly non-oppressive ones) you are sorely lacking in the cynicism department. Go read the recent Bruce Perens essay Is DRM Just a Consumer Rights Issue?. I&#8217;ll also repeat two of my favorite sentences in the history of this blog under the subheading What Would Brezhnev Do?: The Soviet Union took information control to extremes, including prohibiting use of photocopiers by scientists. I suspect that had the USSR survived to this day, the KGB would now be furiously trying to make Digital Restrictions Management work so as to gain access to a few of the wonders of computing without permitting open communication. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Yes, plenty of room to talk with recent posts entitled &#8216;Google bachelor watch: Larry and Lucy &#8220;kissy-faced&#8221; in Maui&#8217; and &#8216;Girl sues MySpace because boys are too hot&#8217; &#8230; regardless, Valleywag critically misses the point that DRM and more generally copyright are free speech issues. I find the U.S. policy of encouraging intellectual protectionism abroad appalling. If you don&#8217;t think such will be used to further censorship in oppressive states (and supposedly non-oppressive ones) you are sorely lacking in the cynicism department. Go read the recent Bruce Perens essay Is DRM Just a Consumer Rights Issue?. I&#8217;ll also repeat two of my favorite sentences in the history of this blog under the subheading What Would Brezhnev Do?: The Soviet Union took information control to extremes, including prohibiting use of photocopiers by scientists. I suspect that had the USSR survived to this day, the KGB would now be furiously trying to make Digital Restrictions Management work so as to gain access to a few of the wonders of computing without permitting open communication. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
