<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SXSW &#038; Etech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2005/03/12/sxsw-etech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2005/03/12/sxsw-etech/</link>
	<description>My opinions only. I do not represent any organization in this publication.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 08:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Linksvayer &#187; SemWeb, AI, Java: The Ontological Parallels</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2005/03/12/sxsw-etech/#comment-3773</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer &#187; SemWeb, AI, Java: The Ontological Parallels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2006 06:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2005/03/12/sxsw-etech/#comment-3773</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;The Semantic Web: Promising Future or Utter Failure&#8221;, the panel I took part in at SXSW shed little light on the topic. Each panelist (including me) brought their own idiosyncratic views to bear and largely talked past each other. The overall SXSW interactive crowd seemed to tend toward web designers and web marketers, not sure about the audience for this panel. Some people, e.g., Chet Campbell, and others in person, apparently left with the impression that all of the panelists agreed that the semantic web is an utter failure (not my view at all). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;The Semantic Web: Promising Future or Utter Failure&#8221;, the panel I took part in at SXSW shed little light on the topic. Each panelist (including me) brought their own idiosyncratic views to bear and largely talked past each other. The overall SXSW interactive crowd seemed to tend toward web designers and web marketers, not sure about the audience for this panel. Some people, e.g., Chet Campbell, and others in person, apparently left with the impression that all of the panelists agreed that the semantic web is an utter failure (not my view at all). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Linksvayer &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Lucene red handed</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2005/03/12/sxsw-etech/#comment-3185</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Lucene red handed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2005 18:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2005/03/12/sxsw-etech/#comment-3185</guid>
		<description>[...] A review of Lucene in Action posted on Slashdot yesterday reminded me to make this post. I read the book in March shortly before giving a related talk at Etech in order to avoid sounding too stupid. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A review of Lucene in Action posted on Slashdot yesterday reminded me to make this post. I read the book in March shortly before giving a related talk at Etech in order to avoid sounding too stupid. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
