<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Imperial Public License</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2005/04/08/imperial-public-license/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2005/04/08/imperial-public-license/</link>
	<description>My opinions only. I do not represent any organization in this publication.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dun Naif</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2005/04/08/imperial-public-license/#comment-2960</link>
		<dc:creator>Dun Naif</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2005 04:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2005/04/08/imperial-public-license/#comment-2960</guid>
		<description>That is such crap. Sun's contributed OpenOffice, Gnome, NetBeans, LookingGlass, done major work on Mozilla. And the code is available for Java. What's not is Microsoft's ability to fork it - or IBM's, your big buddy. You've become a tool for IBM (who last I checked has given NOTHING OF VALUE to the GPL world).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is such crap. Sun&#8217;s contributed OpenOffice, Gnome, NetBeans, LookingGlass, done major work on Mozilla. And the code is available for Java. What&#8217;s not is Microsoft&#8217;s ability to fork it - or IBM&#8217;s, your big buddy. You&#8217;ve become a tool for IBM (who last I checked has given NOTHING OF VALUE to the GPL world).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Code Guru</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2005/04/08/imperial-public-license/#comment-2959</link>
		<dc:creator>Code Guru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2005 20:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2005/04/08/imperial-public-license/#comment-2959</guid>
		<description>It's quite obvious that Sun would like nothing more than open source to disappear. This comes up every time there is an attempt on their &lt;a href="http://open-java.blogspot.com/2005/04/classpath-vs-sun-nefarious-plans-to.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;castle hoarding Java&lt;/a&gt; from the barbarians at the gate! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s quite obvious that Sun would like nothing more than open source to disappear. This comes up every time there is an attempt on their <a href="http://open-java.blogspot.com/2005/04/classpath-vs-sun-nefarious-plans-to.html" rel="nofollow">castle hoarding Java</a> from the barbarians at the gate!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dun Naif</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2005/04/08/imperial-public-license/#comment-2958</link>
		<dc:creator>Dun Naif</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2005 16:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2005/04/08/imperial-public-license/#comment-2958</guid>
		<description>Those competitors are nearly irrelevant in Sun's big-box world. His point is the biggest competitors are based in America, and developing nations should pay attention to supposedly charitable US-based companys coming to tell them how wonderful GPL is. And while we have morons like &lt;a href="http://news.zdnet.com/2100-3513_22-5621156.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; running around, I have a hard time disagreeing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those competitors are nearly irrelevant in Sun&#8217;s big-box world. His point is the biggest competitors are based in America, and developing nations should pay attention to supposedly charitable US-based companys coming to tell them how wonderful GPL is. And while we have morons like <a href="http://news.zdnet.com/2100-3513_22-5621156.html" rel="nofollow">this</a> running around, I have a hard time disagreeing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Linksvayer</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2005/04/08/imperial-public-license/#comment-2957</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2005 15:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2005/04/08/imperial-public-license/#comment-2957</guid>
		<description>His point is then completely wrong. What evidence is there that RHAT is the "near exclusive beneficiary of GPL code in the software industry"?  RH is &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; the Microsoft of the free software world.  It has &lt;a href="http://distrowatch.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;many direct competitors&lt;/a&gt;, including Novell/Suse (US &#38; Germany), Mandrake/Conectiva/Mandriva (France and Brazil) and Canonical (South Africa &#38; EU) and may indirect competitors who build on Linux and other GPL software, &lt;a href="http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=sunjds" rel="nofollow"&gt;including Sun&lt;/a&gt; and most other large systems companies. There are also countless software companies that do not compete with Red Hat at all that benefit from GPL code. Nearly every software company in existence I'd bet uses some GPL'd tools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>His point is then completely wrong. What evidence is there that RHAT is the &#8220;near exclusive beneficiary of GPL code in the software industry&#8221;?  RH is <em>not</em> the Microsoft of the free software world.  It has <a href="http://distrowatch.com/" rel="nofollow">many direct competitors</a>, including Novell/Suse (US &amp; Germany), Mandrake/Conectiva/Mandriva (France and Brazil) and Canonical (South Africa &amp; EU) and may indirect competitors who build on Linux and other GPL software, <a href="http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=sunjds" rel="nofollow">including Sun</a> and most other large systems companies. There are also countless software companies that do not compete with Red Hat at all that benefit from GPL code. Nearly every software company in existence I&#8217;d bet uses some GPL&#8217;d tools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dun Naif</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2005/04/08/imperial-public-license/#comment-2956</link>
		<dc:creator>Dun Naif</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2005 02:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2005/04/08/imperial-public-license/#comment-2956</guid>
		<description>His point is Red Hat is the near exclusive beneficiary of GPL code in the software industry. And they, along with IBM, are the primary companies benefiting from people running the GPL licensed products. Both are US based companies. Both are complete hypocrites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>His point is Red Hat is the near exclusive beneficiary of GPL code in the software industry. And they, along with IBM, are the primary companies benefiting from people running the GPL licensed products. Both are US based companies. Both are complete hypocrites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
