<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Withdrawing not an alternative to invading</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2005/07/09/withdrawing-invading/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2005/07/09/withdrawing-invading/</link>
	<description>My opinions only. I do not represent any organization in this publication.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 08:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Linksvayer &#187; Fraud of War in Iraq</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2005/07/09/withdrawing-invading/#comment-3771</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer &#187; Fraud of War in Iraq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2006 06:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/?p=142#comment-3771</guid>
		<description>[...] A better way? See Wright, Scheer, Zakaria, Hardar, Tierney, and Pape. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A better way? See Wright, Scheer, Zakaria, Hardar, Tierney, and Pape. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Linksvayer</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2005/07/09/withdrawing-invading/#comment-3171</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2005 18:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/?p=142#comment-3171</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Enough dead&lt;/strong&gt;

	Thomas Knapp writes:
	1,827 &#8230; and counting. Enough said.
	I shouldn&#8217;t pick on Knapp, whose heart is mostly in the right place (and he&#8217;s a linkmonger, so he probably won&#8217;t mind), but&#8230;
	The sentiment above, that the number ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Enough dead</strong></p>
<p>	Thomas Knapp writes:<br />
	1,827 &#8230; and counting. Enough said.<br />
	I shouldn&#8217;t pick on Knapp, whose heart is mostly in the right place (and he&#8217;s a linkmonger, so he probably won&#8217;t mind), but&#8230;<br />
	The sentiment above, that the number &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anton Sherwood</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2005/07/09/withdrawing-invading/#comment-3159</link>
		<dc:creator>Anton Sherwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2005 10:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/?p=142#comment-3159</guid>
		<description>Somaliland seems to do okay with a power vacuum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somaliland seems to do okay with a power vacuum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Berman</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2005/07/09/withdrawing-invading/#comment-3151</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Berman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2005 05:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/?p=142#comment-3151</guid>
		<description>Another great security strategist is Thomas PM Barnett - last year wrote the book "The Pentagon's new Map" and has one of the best blogs in this sort of analysis at http://www.thomaspmbarnett.com/weblog/

Barnett advocates the creation of a winning the peace force, as well as a role in the world to source security.

Other world class strategists are (sans blogs) Bernard Lewis and Raymond Tanter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another great security strategist is Thomas PM Barnett - last year wrote the book &#8220;The Pentagon&#8217;s new Map&#8221; and has one of the best blogs in this sort of analysis at <a href="http://www.thomaspmbarnett.com/weblog/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thomaspmbarnett.com/weblog/</a></p>
<p>Barnett advocates the creation of a winning the peace force, as well as a role in the world to source security.</p>
<p>Other world class strategists are (sans blogs) Bernard Lewis and Raymond Tanter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Slate</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2005/07/09/withdrawing-invading/#comment-3149</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Slate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2005 20:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/?p=142#comment-3149</guid>
		<description>Agreed. Leaving at this moment would not be satisfactory, as it would leave a power vacuum in Iraq that would almsot certainly lead to civil war. Instability does not equate with success. 

We do need to get out of the Middle East. But not until we've finished the job in Iraq and the Iraqis can be left to handle their own affairs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. Leaving at this moment would not be satisfactory, as it would leave a power vacuum in Iraq that would almsot certainly lead to civil war. Instability does not equate with success. </p>
<p>We do need to get out of the Middle East. But not until we&#8217;ve finished the job in Iraq and the Iraqis can be left to handle their own affairs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
