<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Accelerating cars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2005/08/06/accelerating-cars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2005/08/06/accelerating-cars/</link>
	<description>My opinions only. I do not represent any organization in this publication.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 08:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Linksvayer &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The luxury of falling prices</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2005/08/06/accelerating-cars/#comment-3550</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The luxury of falling prices</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2005 20:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/?p=159#comment-3550</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;d prefer to wait for replacement with intelligently designed (by bio-engineers) eyes with vastly greater capabilies than my current amazing yet severely limited evolved set&#8211;better for watching the scenery from my future driverless car. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;d prefer to wait for replacement with intelligently designed (by bio-engineers) eyes with vastly greater capabilies than my current amazing yet severely limited evolved set&#8211;better for watching the scenery from my future driverless car. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Linksvayer</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2005/08/06/accelerating-cars/#comment-3175</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2005 17:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/?p=159#comment-3175</guid>
		<description>Brain:

The car that you did drive (an upscale VW) could be the subject of another question/rant on brand positioning.  I don't understand VW's attempt to take the brand upscale, particularly when they also own Audi, which is already in that niche, and a few super high end brands (Bentley, Bugatti, Lamborghini).  VW isn't alone is inexplicably going upscale. Wikipedia currently says this about &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturn_automobile#Future" rel="nofollow"&gt;Saturn&lt;/a&gt;:
&lt;blockquote&gt;The Saturn brand will be repositioned in the upper-end of the family car market, stopping just south of entry-level luxury. Volkswagen is in the same market position that GM wants to take Saturn (only going as high as the Passat). Saturn faces a struggle in achieving a premium image. When GM showed the Aura to a focus group with no badge on it, participants gave it a rating of 5/5 in terms of desirability and style. When they discovered that they were looking at a Saturn, the average rating dropped to 2.5/5.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Bizarre.

Gordon:

My observations are limited to ten states in the last couple years (CA, IL, MA, MO, NV, NY, OR, TX (Austin only), WA, and WI) and I probably don't notice the difference between a SUV and giant-SUV. I should probably remove "large" before "SUVs" above. I suspect that much of any actual difference in ownership of large &#38; expensive vehicles in the SF bay area versus elsewhere can be explained by this area's relatively high income. Regardless, consumers across the country have opted for larger vehicles in the past ~20 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brain:</p>
<p>The car that you did drive (an upscale VW) could be the subject of another question/rant on brand positioning.  I don&#8217;t understand VW&#8217;s attempt to take the brand upscale, particularly when they also own Audi, which is already in that niche, and a few super high end brands (Bentley, Bugatti, Lamborghini).  VW isn&#8217;t alone is inexplicably going upscale. Wikipedia currently says this about <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturn_automobile#Future" rel="nofollow">Saturn</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The Saturn brand will be repositioned in the upper-end of the family car market, stopping just south of entry-level luxury. Volkswagen is in the same market position that GM wants to take Saturn (only going as high as the Passat). Saturn faces a struggle in achieving a premium image. When GM showed the Aura to a focus group with no badge on it, participants gave it a rating of 5/5 in terms of desirability and style. When they discovered that they were looking at a Saturn, the average rating dropped to 2.5/5.</p></blockquote>
<p>Bizarre.</p>
<p>Gordon:</p>
<p>My observations are limited to ten states in the last couple years (CA, IL, MA, MO, NV, NY, OR, TX (Austin only), WA, and WI) and I probably don&#8217;t notice the difference between a SUV and giant-SUV. I should probably remove &#8220;large&#8221; before &#8220;SUVs&#8221; above. I suspect that much of any actual difference in ownership of large &amp; expensive vehicles in the SF bay area versus elsewhere can be explained by this area&#8217;s relatively high income. Regardless, consumers across the country have opted for larger vehicles in the past ~20 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon Mohr</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2005/08/06/accelerating-cars/#comment-3173</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Mohr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2005 04:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/?p=159#comment-3173</guid>
		<description>In my experience, there are a greater proportion of giganto-SUVs in Texas than SF, and my general impression is that both SUVs and giant-SUVs are more prevalent where people do more driving (sprawling cities and suburbia) and have large families. SF has a good number of SUVs, but not too many of the giant hard-to-park suburbans/expeditions/etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my experience, there are a greater proportion of giganto-SUVs in Texas than SF, and my general impression is that both SUVs and giant-SUVs are more prevalent where people do more driving (sprawling cities and suburbia) and have large families. SF has a good number of SUVs, but not too many of the giant hard-to-park suburbans/expeditions/etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Heung</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2005/08/06/accelerating-cars/#comment-3169</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Heung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2005 03:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/?p=159#comment-3169</guid>
		<description>I guess I should have probably taken my family's Volvo 240 station wagon that time down to Yahoo! Sunnyvale. Just a thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I should have probably taken my family&#8217;s Volvo 240 station wagon that time down to Yahoo! Sunnyvale. Just a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
