<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Search 2006</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/01/14/search-2006/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/01/14/search-2006/</link>
	<description>My opinions only. I do not represent any organization in this publication.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 02:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Linksvayer</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/01/14/search-2006/#comment-3798</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2006 19:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/01/14/search-2006/#comment-3798</guid>
		<description>Certainly bundling will take Firefox adoption to the next level. Google Pack is an example of that. Even better would be preinstalls on new computers. There are many rumors that Dell will do this.

FWIW there was (is, waiting to be judged) a &lt;a href="http://ideafutures.com/fx-bin/Claim?claim=IEdrop" rel="nofollow"&gt;Foresight Exchange claim about IE market share&lt;/a&gt; last year. Unfortunately its possible trading range (mapped to IE share -- 80 to 90 percent) was very narrow, so although the trading price swung wildly, mapped to IE share it was never far from the final result.  I don't think anything can be said about the market's success or lack thereof in this case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Certainly bundling will take Firefox adoption to the next level. Google Pack is an example of that. Even better would be preinstalls on new computers. There are many rumors that Dell will do this.</p>
<p>FWIW there was (is, waiting to be judged) a <a href="http://ideafutures.com/fx-bin/Claim?claim=IEdrop" rel="nofollow">Foresight Exchange claim about IE market share</a> last year. Unfortunately its possible trading range (mapped to IE share &#8212; 80 to 90 percent) was very narrow, so although the trading price swung wildly, mapped to IE share it was never far from the final result.  I don&#8217;t think anything can be said about the market&#8217;s success or lack thereof in this case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris. F. Masse .COM</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/01/14/search-2006/#comment-3794</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris. F. Masse .COM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2006 16:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/01/14/search-2006/#comment-3794</guid>
		<description>"Firefox is the exciting platform for web development, but barely made a dent in Internet Explorer’s market share."

Thanks for the link. 9% is not bad, but they got 3/4 of that growth during the first half of the year 2005.

Mike L., do you think that Google will help popularizing FireFox?

http://pack.google.com/

CFM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Firefox is the exciting platform for web development, but barely made a dent in Internet Explorer’s market share.&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks for the link. 9% is not bad, but they got 3/4 of that growth during the first half of the year 2005.</p>
<p>Mike L., do you think that Google will help popularizing FireFox?</p>
<p><a href="http://pack.google.com/" rel="nofollow">http://pack.google.com/</a></p>
<p>CFM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
