<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CodeCon Saturday</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/02/12/codecon-saturday-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/02/12/codecon-saturday-2/</link>
	<description>My opinions only. I do not represent any organization in this publication.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 21:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Linksvayer &#187; CodeCon Sunday</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/02/12/codecon-saturday-2/#comment-4290</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer &#187; CodeCon Sunday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/02/12/codecon-saturday-2/#comment-4290</guid>
		<description>[...] Mike Linksvayer My opinions only. I do not represent any organization in this publication.      &#171; CodeCon Saturday [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mike Linksvayer My opinions only. I do not represent any organization in this publication.      &laquo; CodeCon Saturday [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Allen</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/02/12/codecon-saturday-2/#comment-4273</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 06:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/02/12/codecon-saturday-2/#comment-4273</guid>
		<description>&#62; but apparently easier to handle contributor agreements

I can't speak to the merits of the particular license, but if this is true, it is very valuable. Issues regarding contributor agreements has become one of the major obstacles in SynchroEdit. And contributor agreements is something that OSI is not working on nor writing about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; but apparently easier to handle contributor agreements</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t speak to the merits of the particular license, but if this is true, it is very valuable. Issues regarding contributor agreements has become one of the major obstacles in SynchroEdit. And contributor agreements is something that OSI is not working on nor writing about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
