<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CodeCon Extra</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/02/13/codecon-extra/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/02/13/codecon-extra/</link>
	<description>My opinions only. I do not represent any organization in this publication.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 19:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Linksvayer &#187; LinuxWorld San Francisco</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/02/13/codecon-extra/#comment-20860</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer &#187; LinuxWorld San Francisco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/02/13/codecon-extra/#comment-20860</guid>
		<description>[...] By far the most interesting exhibition booth to me was Cleversafe, an open source dispersed storage project that announced a Linux filesystem interface at the conference and was written up in today&#8217;s New York Times and Slashdot. I&#8217;ve been waiting for something like this for a long time, particularly since Allmydata is not open source and does not support Linux. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] By far the most interesting exhibition booth to me was Cleversafe, an open source dispersed storage project that announced a Linux filesystem interface at the conference and was written up in today&#8217;s New York Times and Slashdot. I&#8217;ve been waiting for something like this for a long time, particularly since Allmydata is not open source and does not support Linux. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Linksvayer &#187; Free software needs P2P</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/02/13/codecon-extra/#comment-17397</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer &#187; Free software needs P2P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2006 02:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/02/13/codecon-extra/#comment-17397</guid>
		<description>[...] I hesitated to include this point because I hesitate to recommend that most people host services under a domain name they control. What is the half-life of http://blog.john.smith.name vs. http://johnsmith.blogspot.com or js@john.smith.name vs. johnsmith@gmail.com? Wouldn&#8217;t it suck to be John Smith if everything in his life pointed at john.smith.name and the domain was hijacked? I think Wes and I discussed exactly this outside CodeCon earlier this year. Certainly it is preferable for a service to allow hosting under one&#8217;s own domain (as Blogger and several others do), but I wish I felt a little more certain of the long-term survivability of my own [domain] names. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I hesitated to include this point because I hesitate to recommend that most people host services under a domain name they control. What is the half-life of <a href="http://blog.john.smith.name" rel="nofollow">http://blog.john.smith.name</a> vs. <a href="http://johnsmith.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://johnsmith.blogspot.com</a> or <a href="mailto:js@john.smith.name">js@john.smith.name</a> vs. <a href="mailto:johnsmith@gmail.com">johnsmith@gmail.com</a>? Wouldn&#8217;t it suck to be John Smith if everything in his life pointed at john.smith.name and the domain was hijacked? I think Wes and I discussed exactly this outside CodeCon earlier this year. Certainly it is preferable for a service to allow hosting under one&#8217;s own domain (as Blogger and several others do), but I wish I felt a little more certain of the long-term survivability of my own [domain] names. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
