<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Boing Boing promotes supply-side anti-censorship</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/02/27/boing-boing-nudity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/02/27/boing-boing-nudity/</link>
	<description>My opinions only. I do not represent any organization in this publication.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 19:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ed Kohler</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/02/27/boing-boing-nudity/#comment-4516</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Kohler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2006 21:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/02/27/boing-boing-nudity/#comment-4516</guid>
		<description>I've long wondered how programs can detect the intent of an image they find nudity within. If publishing non-pornographic nudes could cripple the programs, I guess they're not very smart. Kind of like Star Wars defense systems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve long wondered how programs can detect the intent of an image they find nudity within. If publishing non-pornographic nudes could cripple the programs, I guess they&#8217;re not very smart. Kind of like Star Wars defense systems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
