<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who&#8217;s harmed by (housing) inflation?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/03/23/housing-inflation-harm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/03/23/housing-inflation-harm/</link>
	<description>My opinions only. I do not represent any organization in this publication.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 19:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Linksvayer &#187; Another trillion dollar fraud</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/03/23/housing-inflation-harm/#comment-99757</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer &#187; Another trillion dollar fraud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 04:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/03/23/housing-inflation-harm/#comment-99757</guid>
		<description>[...] Stop the bailout, which will only prolong the pain and ensure future bubbles. Instead take this &#8220;crisis&#8221; as an opportunity to eliminate all of the various politically imposed causes of expensive housing. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Stop the bailout, which will only prolong the pain and ensure future bubbles. Instead take this &#8220;crisis&#8221; as an opportunity to eliminate all of the various politically imposed causes of expensive housing. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Ruspini</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/03/23/housing-inflation-harm/#comment-5394</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Ruspini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 14:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/03/23/housing-inflation-harm/#comment-5394</guid>
		<description>Well, if they are selling to buy, rising prices wash-out to some extent.  Yes, since they are probably buying something better, the multiplier effect will work against them, but a noteworthy error?  Eh.  Likewise for potential multiple home-owners.  Neglecting a rigorous attempt to quantify it, it doesn't seem that significant in terms of the overall imbalance.

By the way, that was more of a news than an opinion piece.  Although I shared the questions, I was reporting what Gartman and others asked the panelists (and their lack of satisfactory responses on the buyer point).  For opinion, I think the market will be a success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, if they are selling to buy, rising prices wash-out to some extent.  Yes, since they are probably buying something better, the multiplier effect will work against them, but a noteworthy error?  Eh.  Likewise for potential multiple home-owners.  Neglecting a rigorous attempt to quantify it, it doesn&#8217;t seem that significant in terms of the overall imbalance.</p>
<p>By the way, that was more of a news than an opinion piece.  Although I shared the questions, I was reporting what Gartman and others asked the panelists (and their lack of satisfactory responses on the buyer point).  For opinion, I think the market will be a success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
