<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tiananmen Sex Trends</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/05/10/tiananmen-sex-trends/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/05/10/tiananmen-sex-trends/</link>
	<description>My opinions only. I do not represent any organization in this publication.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 20:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Linksvayer &#187; Sex on Wikipedia</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/05/10/tiananmen-sex-trends/#comment-22190</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer &#187; Sex on Wikipedia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 20:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/05/10/tiananmen-sex-trends/#comment-22190</guid>
		<description>[...] Now I want to know whether Arabic Wikipedia has articles on sex (there is currently no interlanguage link to the Arabic Wikipedia from the English Sex article) and if so are they relatively even more popular than their English counterparts. If not I smell opportunity for Arabic-literate Wikipedians. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Now I want to know whether Arabic Wikipedia has articles on sex (there is currently no interlanguage link to the Arabic Wikipedia from the English Sex article) and if so are they relatively even more popular than their English counterparts. If not I smell opportunity for Arabic-literate Wikipedians. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris. F. Masse .COM</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/05/10/tiananmen-sex-trends/#comment-8053</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris. F. Masse .COM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 10:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/05/10/tiananmen-sex-trends/#comment-8053</guid>
		<description>Hi Mike and the readers,

I'm #4 at Google for the "prediction markets" search query.

I received 25 queries last month. I wonder how many of such a query did the #1 received. Maybe two times that number. That would be 50.

How many "prediction markets" queries do you need for you to say that it will "make the cut".

How much time are we from there?

Sorry to be to such a tough debater. I'm just a curious guy. (A sin, probably.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mike and the readers,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m #4 at Google for the &#8220;prediction markets&#8221; search query.</p>
<p>I received 25 queries last month. I wonder how many of such a query did the #1 received. Maybe two times that number. That would be 50.</p>
<p>How many &#8220;prediction markets&#8221; queries do you need for you to say that it will &#8220;make the cut&#8221;.</p>
<p>How much time are we from there?</p>
<p>Sorry to be to such a tough debater. I&#8217;m just a curious guy. (A sin, probably.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Linksvayer</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/05/10/tiananmen-sex-trends/#comment-7991</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 00:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/05/10/tiananmen-sex-trends/#comment-7991</guid>
		<description>As far as I can tell Trends always treats groups of words as if they were quoted.  Adding quotes obtains the same result, but mysteriously without related news articles.

For your information I received 1,172 queries from www.google.com (and several hundred from other google domains) with no (or at least fewer than five) queries for "prediction market[s]" but 40 for "prediction" alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I can tell Trends always treats groups of words as if they were quoted.  Adding quotes obtains the same result, but mysteriously without related news articles.</p>
<p>For your information I received 1,172 queries from <a href="http://www.google.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com</a> (and several hundred from other google domains) with no (or at least fewer than five) queries for &#8220;prediction market[s]&#8221; but 40 for &#8220;prediction&#8221; alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris. F. Masse .COM</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/05/10/tiananmen-sex-trends/#comment-7989</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris. F. Masse .COM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 23:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/05/10/tiananmen-sex-trends/#comment-7989</guid>
		<description>"Prediction market doesn’t make the cut, though I predict it will soon."

I also tried out the "prediction markets" phrase. Do you think it's because Google Trends does not take phrases (as opposed to single keywords)?

For your infomation, in April, I received 1,252 queries from Google.com and only 25 of these were for the phrase "prediction markets" (and 8 for "prediction market").

Ciao bello!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Prediction market doesn’t make the cut, though I predict it will soon.&#8221;</p>
<p>I also tried out the &#8220;prediction markets&#8221; phrase. Do you think it&#8217;s because Google Trends does not take phrases (as opposed to single keywords)?</p>
<p>For your infomation, in April, I received 1,252 queries from Google.com and only 25 of these were for the phrase &#8220;prediction markets&#8221; (and 8 for &#8220;prediction market&#8221;).</p>
<p>Ciao bello!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
