<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Meta those who can&#8217;t</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/10/12/meta-those-who-cant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/10/12/meta-those-who-cant/</link>
	<description>My opinions only. I do not represent any organization in this publication.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 02:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Linksvayer &#187; Table selection, HSA, LugRadio, Music, Photographers, New Media</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/10/12/meta-those-who-cant/#comment-98736</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer &#187; Table selection, HSA, LugRadio, Music, Photographers, New Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 09:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/10/12/meta-those-who-cant/#comment-98736</guid>
		<description>[...] in metadata is one of the least harmful things the industry might do. Not that I don&#8217;t think metadata is great or anything. Wendy Seltzer / CC [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in metadata is one of the least harmful things the industry might do. Not that I don&#8217;t think metadata is great or anything. Wendy Seltzer / CC [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Linksvayer</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/10/12/meta-those-who-cant/#comment-96191</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 20:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/10/12/meta-those-who-cant/#comment-96191</guid>
		<description>jim,

amen to that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jim,</p>
<p>amen to that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim reddy</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/10/12/meta-those-who-cant/#comment-96190</link>
		<dc:creator>jim reddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 19:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/10/12/meta-those-who-cant/#comment-96190</guid>
		<description>"those who can, do; those who can't, teach and those who can 't do or teach, preach"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;those who can, do; those who can&#8217;t, teach and those who can &#8216;t do or teach, preach&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Linksvayer &#187; The disgusting Mr. Linksvayer</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/10/12/meta-those-who-cant/#comment-45587</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer &#187; The disgusting Mr. Linksvayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 06:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/10/12/meta-those-who-cant/#comment-45587</guid>
		<description>[...] I am particularly amused that DeCoster wrote on LewRockwell.com. I used to have a love/hate relationship with this and its sister site, Mises.org. Trenchant and extreme anti-war and anti-government commentary, including against intellectual protectionism. But the occasional Christian apologia, pro-apartheid writers, and general nuts really put me off. Then there&#8217;s the despicable Hoppe. Fortunately I am able to no longer care. There are many substitutes on the topics those sites were good on, and I am mostly convinced by Bryan Caplan on Austrian economics that the school does not just appear to be an ignorable backwater, it is. Part of Caplan&#8217;s conclusion reminds me yet again of the perils of meta: Neoclassical economists go too far by purging meta-economics almost entirely, but there is certainly a reason to be suspicious of scholars who talk about economics without ever doing it. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I am particularly amused that DeCoster wrote on LewRockwell.com. I used to have a love/hate relationship with this and its sister site, Mises.org. Trenchant and extreme anti-war and anti-government commentary, including against intellectual protectionism. But the occasional Christian apologia, pro-apartheid writers, and general nuts really put me off. Then there&#8217;s the despicable Hoppe. Fortunately I am able to no longer care. There are many substitutes on the topics those sites were good on, and I am mostly convinced by Bryan Caplan on Austrian economics that the school does not just appear to be an ignorable backwater, it is. Part of Caplan&#8217;s conclusion reminds me yet again of the perils of meta: Neoclassical economists go too far by purging meta-economics almost entirely, but there is certainly a reason to be suspicious of scholars who talk about economics without ever doing it. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Linksvayer &#187; Microformats are worse</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/10/12/meta-those-who-cant/#comment-42535</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer &#187; Microformats are worse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 02:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/10/12/meta-those-who-cant/#comment-42535</guid>
		<description>[...] Ah, metadata. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ah, metadata. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Ruspini</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/10/12/meta-those-who-cant/#comment-39482</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Ruspini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 17:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/10/12/meta-those-who-cant/#comment-39482</guid>
		<description>What separates professionals from amateurs is often not the conceptual subject matter, but the mundane details of *doing* the job.   I once heard a general say something like, "armchair generals think about battle strategy, but real generals think about supply lines."

So those who only "meta" have some combination of intellectual curiosity and laziness.  They always want to play with the "interesting" questions while avoiding the day-to-day work.   Naturally, they will probably end-up less "useful".  This tendency declines with age, I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What separates professionals from amateurs is often not the conceptual subject matter, but the mundane details of *doing* the job.   I once heard a general say something like, &#8220;armchair generals think about battle strategy, but real generals think about supply lines.&#8221;</p>
<p>So those who only &#8220;meta&#8221; have some combination of intellectual curiosity and laziness.  They always want to play with the &#8220;interesting&#8221; questions while avoiding the day-to-day work.   Naturally, they will probably end-up less &#8220;useful&#8221;.  This tendency declines with age, I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
