<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Meta those who can&#8217;t</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/10/12/meta-those-who-cant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/10/12/meta-those-who-cant/</link>
	<description>My opinions only. I do not represent any organization in this publication.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 14:23:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Linksvayer &#187; Table selection, HSA, LugRadio, Music, Photographers, New Media</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/10/12/meta-those-who-cant/#comment-98736</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer &#187; Table selection, HSA, LugRadio, Music, Photographers, New Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 09:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/10/12/meta-those-who-cant/#comment-98736</guid>
		<description>[...] in metadata is one of the least harmful things the industry might do. Not that I don&#8217;t think metadata is great or anything. Wendy Seltzer / CC [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in metadata is one of the least harmful things the industry might do. Not that I don&#8217;t think metadata is great or anything. Wendy Seltzer / CC [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Linksvayer</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/10/12/meta-those-who-cant/#comment-96191</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 20:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/10/12/meta-those-who-cant/#comment-96191</guid>
		<description>jim,

amen to that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jim,</p>
<p>amen to that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim reddy</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/10/12/meta-those-who-cant/#comment-96190</link>
		<dc:creator>jim reddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 19:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/10/12/meta-those-who-cant/#comment-96190</guid>
		<description>&quot;those who can, do; those who can&#039;t, teach and those who can &#039;t do or teach, preach&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;those who can, do; those who can&#8217;t, teach and those who can &#8216;t do or teach, preach&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Linksvayer &#187; The disgusting Mr. Linksvayer</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/10/12/meta-those-who-cant/#comment-45587</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer &#187; The disgusting Mr. Linksvayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 06:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/10/12/meta-those-who-cant/#comment-45587</guid>
		<description>[...] I am particularly amused that DeCoster wrote on LewRockwell.com. I used to have a love/hate relationship with this and its sister site, Mises.org. Trenchant and extreme anti-war and anti-government commentary, including against intellectual protectionism. But the occasional Christian apologia, pro-apartheid writers, and general nuts really put me off. Then there&#8217;s the despicable Hoppe. Fortunately I am able to no longer care. There are many substitutes on the topics those sites were good on, and I am mostly convinced by Bryan Caplan on Austrian economics that the school does not just appear to be an ignorable backwater, it is. Part of Caplan&#8217;s conclusion reminds me yet again of the perils of meta: Neoclassical economists go too far by purging meta-economics almost entirely, but there is certainly a reason to be suspicious of scholars who talk about economics without ever doing it. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I am particularly amused that DeCoster wrote on LewRockwell.com. I used to have a love/hate relationship with this and its sister site, Mises.org. Trenchant and extreme anti-war and anti-government commentary, including against intellectual protectionism. But the occasional Christian apologia, pro-apartheid writers, and general nuts really put me off. Then there&#8217;s the despicable Hoppe. Fortunately I am able to no longer care. There are many substitutes on the topics those sites were good on, and I am mostly convinced by Bryan Caplan on Austrian economics that the school does not just appear to be an ignorable backwater, it is. Part of Caplan&#8217;s conclusion reminds me yet again of the perils of meta: Neoclassical economists go too far by purging meta-economics almost entirely, but there is certainly a reason to be suspicious of scholars who talk about economics without ever doing it. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Linksvayer &#187; Microformats are worse</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/10/12/meta-those-who-cant/#comment-42535</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer &#187; Microformats are worse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 02:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/10/12/meta-those-who-cant/#comment-42535</guid>
		<description>[...] Ah, metadata. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ah, metadata. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Ruspini</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/10/12/meta-those-who-cant/#comment-39482</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Ruspini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 17:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/10/12/meta-those-who-cant/#comment-39482</guid>
		<description>What separates professionals from amateurs is often not the conceptual subject matter, but the mundane details of *doing* the job.   I once heard a general say something like, &quot;armchair generals think about battle strategy, but real generals think about supply lines.&quot;

So those who only &quot;meta&quot; have some combination of intellectual curiosity and laziness.  They always want to play with the &quot;interesting&quot; questions while avoiding the day-to-day work.   Naturally, they will probably end-up less &quot;useful&quot;.  This tendency declines with age, I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What separates professionals from amateurs is often not the conceptual subject matter, but the mundane details of *doing* the job.   I once heard a general say something like, &#8220;armchair generals think about battle strategy, but real generals think about supply lines.&#8221;</p>
<p>So those who only &#8220;meta&#8221; have some combination of intellectual curiosity and laziness.  They always want to play with the &#8220;interesting&#8221; questions while avoiding the day-to-day work.   Naturally, they will probably end-up less &#8220;useful&#8221;.  This tendency declines with age, I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

