<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microformats are worse</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/10/22/microformats-worse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/10/22/microformats-worse/</link>
	<description>My opinions only. I do not represent any organization in this publication.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 02:54:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Linksvayer &#187; Perils of a too cool name</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/10/22/microformats-worse/#comment-89533</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer &#187; Perils of a too cool name</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 01:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/10/22/microformats-worse/#comment-89533</guid>
		<description>[...] seen lots of confusion about microformats, but Jon Udell takes the cake in describing XMP: It’s a bit of a mish-mash, to say the least. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] seen lots of confusion about microformats, but Jon Udell takes the cake in describing XMP: It’s a bit of a mish-mash, to say the least. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Linksvayer &#187; Wikipedia and Linking 2.0</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/10/22/microformats-worse/#comment-79905</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer &#187; Wikipedia and Linking 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 20:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2006/10/22/microformats-worse/#comment-79905</guid>
		<description>[...] In the case of non-Wikipedia links (and those too), combatting linkrot and providing alternate and related (e.g., reference, reply, archival) links is an obvious feature add for social bookmarking services and can be made available to a CMS or browser via the usual web API/feed/scraping mechanisms. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In the case of non-Wikipedia links (and those too), combatting linkrot and providing alternate and related (e.g., reference, reply, archival) links is an obvious feature add for social bookmarking services and can be made available to a CMS or browser via the usual web API/feed/scraping mechanisms. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
