Comments on: Wikipedia and Linking 2.0 http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2007/01/22/wikipedia-links/ My opinions only. I do not represent any organization in this publication. Thu, 24 May 2012 02:05:14 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Mike Linksvayer http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2007/01/22/wikipedia-links/#comment-80175 Mike Linksvayer Tue, 23 Jan 2007 03:45:25 +0000 http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2007/01/22/wikipedia-links/#comment-80175 Yes, that is a reason to be careful, especially when linking to new articles. I could also imagine future notability police aggressively culling articles about entities that seem notable right now but certainly won't in a generation. OTOH their sites would most likely have disappeared in a generation anyway... Yes, that is a reason to be careful, especially when linking to new articles.

I could also imagine future notability police aggressively culling articles about entities that seem notable right now but certainly won’t in a generation. OTOH their sites would most likely have disappeared in a generation anyway…

]]> By: Gordon Mohr http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2007/01/22/wikipedia-links/#comment-79967 Gordon Mohr Mon, 22 Jan 2007 21:40:10 +0000 http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2007/01/22/wikipedia-links/#comment-79967 One possible reason not to use Wikipedia links as liberally as you suggest: notability police might decide the topic is non-notable, and delete the article. One possible reason not to use Wikipedia links as liberally as you suggest: notability police might decide the topic is non-notable, and delete the article.

]]>