<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Perils of a too cool name</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2007/02/14/xmp-microformat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2007/02/14/xmp-microformat/</link>
	<description>My opinions only. I do not represent any organization in this publication.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 14:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gordon Mohr</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2007/02/14/xmp-microformat/#comment-89751</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Mohr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 08:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2007/02/14/xmp-microformat/#comment-89751</guid>
		<description>'Microformats' is inherently too cute, self-descriptive, and generic of a term to be strictly defined as what the coiners prefer. Anything that's a small format easily embedded elsewhere is going to wind up described as such. (It's probably even enough that the typical instantiations of the format are 'small' even if the format description is large and complex.) Language does what it wants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Microformats&#8217; is inherently too cute, self-descriptive, and generic of a term to be strictly defined as what the coiners prefer. Anything that&#8217;s a small format easily embedded elsewhere is going to wind up described as such. (It&#8217;s probably even enough that the typical instantiations of the format are &#8217;small&#8217; even if the format description is large and complex.) Language does what it wants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elias Torres &#187; Blog Archive &#187; XMP and microformats == RDFa</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2007/02/14/xmp-microformat/#comment-89554</link>
		<dc:creator>Elias Torres &#187; Blog Archive &#187; XMP and microformats == RDFa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 19:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2007/02/14/xmp-microformat/#comment-89554</guid>
		<description>[...] of exercising too much poetic license for calling XMP (a subset of RDF), get this: a microformat!. Mike and Danny go on picking on a little slip up from the man himself. However, both of these men are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of exercising too much poetic license for calling XMP (a subset of RDF), get this: a microformat!. Mike and Danny go on picking on a little slip up from the man himself. However, both of these men are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
