<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LimeWire more popular than Firefox?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2007/05/05/limewire-more-popular-than-firefox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2007/05/05/limewire-more-popular-than-firefox/</link>
	<description>My opinions only. I do not represent any organization in this publication.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 02:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Linksvayer &#187; LimeWire popularity</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2007/05/05/limewire-more-popular-than-firefox/#comment-97145</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer &#187; LimeWire popularity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 04:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2007/05/05/limewire-more-popular-than-firefox/#comment-97145</guid>
		<description>[...] continue to be intrigued by LimeWire&#8217;s huge and relatively unsung popularity. According to a December 13 release: More [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] continue to be intrigued by LimeWire&#8217;s huge and relatively unsung popularity. According to a December 13 release: More [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
