<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Peer producing think tank transparency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2007/10/31/think-tank-peer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2007/10/31/think-tank-peer/</link>
	<description>My opinions only. I do not represent any organization in this publication.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 03:56:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Linksvayer</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2007/10/31/think-tank-peer/#comment-96729</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 03:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2007/10/31/think-tank-peer/#comment-96729</guid>
		<description>gurdonark, yes, there seems to be some evidence in favor of open access journal &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citation_impact&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;impact&lt;/a&gt;&quot; that should be analogous for think tanks.

Tim, I can imagine think tank (or part of one) that heavily relies on outsider contributions, but that would be a special case, just as a peer produced scientific journal article would be a very special case. I wouldn&#039;t expect people to do day to day work for a think tank. The value is in encouraging others to reuse, spread, and most importantly scrutinize a think tank&#039;s day to day work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gurdonark, yes, there seems to be some evidence in favor of open access journal &#8220;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citation_impact" rel="nofollow">impact</a>&#8221; that should be analogous for think tanks.</p>
<p>Tim, I can imagine think tank (or part of one) that heavily relies on outsider contributions, but that would be a special case, just as a peer produced scientific journal article would be a very special case. I wouldn&#8217;t expect people to do day to day work for a think tank. The value is in encouraging others to reuse, spread, and most importantly scrutinize a think tank&#8217;s day to day work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Lee</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2007/10/31/think-tank-peer/#comment-96724</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2007/10/31/think-tank-peer/#comment-96724</guid>
		<description>I certainly think releasing think tank papers under Creative Commons is a good idea. Beyond that, is there anything in particular you think think tanks should be doing to harness peer production? I have a little trouble imagining there are enough people out there who want to contribute to policy papers for free to be especially useful in the day-to-day work of a think tank.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I certainly think releasing think tank papers under Creative Commons is a good idea. Beyond that, is there anything in particular you think think tanks should be doing to harness peer production? I have a little trouble imagining there are enough people out there who want to contribute to policy papers for free to be especially useful in the day-to-day work of a think tank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gurdonark</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2007/10/31/think-tank-peer/#comment-96723</link>
		<dc:creator>gurdonark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 10:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2007/10/31/think-tank-peer/#comment-96723</guid>
		<description>This is a good point. I think, too, that think tanks will have more influence when they make more information available on a more open source basis.
Guerrilla marketing techniques could convert a given &quot;idea manufacturer&quot; into a free bargain in the marketplace of ideas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a good point. I think, too, that think tanks will have more influence when they make more information available on a more open source basis.<br />
Guerrilla marketing techniques could convert a given &#8220;idea manufacturer&#8221; into a free bargain in the marketplace of ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

