<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Table selection, HSA, LugRadio, Music, Photographers, New Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2008/04/21/selection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2008/04/21/selection/</link>
	<description>My opinions only. I do not represent any organization in this publication.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 04:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: gurdonark</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2008/04/21/selection/#comment-98748</link>
		<dc:creator>gurdonark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 18:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/?p=527#comment-98748</guid>
		<description>Both you and John Buckman created really good slide shows--I wish I could have heard each talk. Although, in general, I agree that open culture is ten years-ish behind open software, the varying nature of the issues (highlighted in part in your talk) make the direct comparison of limited (though interesting) utility.

I see open music gaining public acceptance much as I see the way that cell phones gained public acceptance. The technology was in place for affordable, consumer-friendly cell phones long before the consumer acceptance arose. Then, as if a windstorm hit, suddenly everyone had a cell phone. Although cellular telephony had the advantage of massive capital in-flow into its development, it had and has numerous format, band, and technology disadvantages that, in theory, could have rendered the technology unpopular. 

In the case of open source music, the challenge is less a challenge of which license is the most "free" (though that issue, which you covered well in your slide show, is very interesting) than an issue of how to let people know that technology has liberated music culture from corporate hegemony. Unlike with Linux, this is a battle that will be won by lay-people
rather than creative engineering/applications types.  The battle for open culture, appropriately, will be one for the poets as much as the scientists.

Sounds like a fun set of presentations. We need one of those in the Dallas area.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both you and John Buckman created really good slide shows&#8211;I wish I could have heard each talk. Although, in general, I agree that open culture is ten years-ish behind open software, the varying nature of the issues (highlighted in part in your talk) make the direct comparison of limited (though interesting) utility.</p>
<p>I see open music gaining public acceptance much as I see the way that cell phones gained public acceptance. The technology was in place for affordable, consumer-friendly cell phones long before the consumer acceptance arose. Then, as if a windstorm hit, suddenly everyone had a cell phone. Although cellular telephony had the advantage of massive capital in-flow into its development, it had and has numerous format, band, and technology disadvantages that, in theory, could have rendered the technology unpopular. </p>
<p>In the case of open source music, the challenge is less a challenge of which license is the most &#8220;free&#8221; (though that issue, which you covered well in your slide show, is very interesting) than an issue of how to let people know that technology has liberated music culture from corporate hegemony. Unlike with Linux, this is a battle that will be won by lay-people<br />
rather than creative engineering/applications types.  The battle for open culture, appropriately, will be one for the poets as much as the scientists.</p>
<p>Sounds like a fun set of presentations. We need one of those in the Dallas area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2008/04/21/selection/#comment-98743</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 20:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/?p=527#comment-98743</guid>
		<description>btw, tried the column select in opera -- doesn't work</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>btw, tried the column select in opera &#8212; doesn&#8217;t work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Hibbert</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2008/04/21/selection/#comment-98741</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Hibbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/?p=527#comment-98741</guid>
		<description>On the Mac, column selection is apparently Command-select, not control-select.  I've looked for this functionality recently and never found it.  If I had found it a week ago when I wanted it, I would have attributed it to the TableTools plug-in which I now use.  That one gives me after-market table sorting and other things, but I hadn't realized I already had column select!  Thanks, Mike.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the Mac, column selection is apparently Command-select, not control-select.  I&#8217;ve looked for this functionality recently and never found it.  If I had found it a week ago when I wanted it, I would have attributed it to the TableTools plug-in which I now use.  That one gives me after-market table sorting and other things, but I hadn&#8217;t realized I already had column select!  Thanks, Mike.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2008/04/21/selection/#comment-98740</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 16:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/?p=527#comment-98740</guid>
		<description>Ubuntu should give a complimentary live cd instead of a mint</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ubuntu should give a complimentary live cd instead of a mint</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
